Share your current agentic AI workflow, tool-use surface, and highest-risk actions. LUXION Systems will assess where pre-execution control, auditability, and compute governance may be valuable.
No backend submission required — use mailto to start a technical review conversation. Direct fallback: [email protected]
Who this is for
Teams that:
are testing or deploying AI agents
use tool calls, APIs, memory, file operations, or workflow automation
operate in high-trust, regulated, or security-sensitive environments
care about auditability, runtime control, and compute cost
can provide representative workflows for shadow-mode evaluation
Non-ideal fit
Not currently for:
teams only looking for a chatbot UI
teams without tool-using or workflow-executing AI
users seeking generic prompt engineering
organizations expecting production certification on day one
buyers wanting fixed self-serve pricing before technical scoping
What the pilot produces
Structured outputs from an observation-mode engagement — not production certification.
Action inventory
Evidence sufficiency report
Policy-boundary map
Escalation model
Governed action record examples
Technical scoping report
Evidence trust signal
Observed result
On an AgentDojo-compatible budget validation slice, Guardian Runtime achieved a five-seed STRONG PASS across 500 task/injection pairs: mean utility 0.702 [0.678–0.724], mean security 0.914, and mean attack success 0.086, with 4/5 seeds passing the full gate and 5/5 seeds passing security + attack constraints. Single-seed flagship reference: 0.74 utility, 0.91 security, 0.09 attack success across 100 pairs.
Claim boundary
AgentDojo-compatible budget validation. budget_nonleaderboard. official_comparable=false. Not an official leaderboard result. Not production safety certification. Not a general solution to agent safety.
Not claimed
Guardian Runtime is not presented as production certification, guaranteed compliance, measured production ROI, or a complete solution to agent safety. Current evidence is controlled budget-validation and internal infrastructure validation.
Shadow-mode pilot safety
Initial pilots can run in shadow mode: Guardian Runtime evaluates proposed AI actions and records what would have been allowed, blocked, escalated, or routed, without interfering with production execution.
Execution economics
As AI systems begin acting through tools, APIs, workflows, and memory, the economic problem is not only whether agent actions are admissible under policy. It is whether their actions are worth executing, which model should execute them, what the action costs, what risks it creates, and whether the decision can be reconstructed later.
Design-partner pilots are where execution economics become measurable: controlled shadow-mode evaluation, pilot-to-production readiness signals, and audit evidence that procurement and risk teams can review before broader deployment.
Pilot objectives
Measure whether pre-execution governance outputs fit your agent oversight and escalation workflows.
Evaluate audit evidence completeness, replay fidelity, and incident reconstruction support in shadow mode.
Assess risk-aware routing and compute-governance signals against representative agent traces.
Document pilot-to-production readiness criteria for procurement, security, legal, and internal review and compliance preparation.
Pilot design
Guardian Runtime design partner pilots are time-bounded engagements for enterprise teams evaluating runtime assurance fit — without authorizing production deployment.
Shadow-mode pilot flow
A time-bounded design-partner path — artifact evaluation and fit assessment, not production authorization.
1
Intake & scope
Define workflows, tool surfaces, and highest-risk actions for shadow-mode evaluation.
2
Shadow evaluation
Guardian classifies proposed actions without interfering with production execution.
3
Weekly review
Structured governance outputs, gate decisions, and audit records reviewed with your team.
4
Fit assessment
Time-bounded report on oversight fit — not production authorization or certification.
Duration: 2–4 weeks
Assess whether Guardian Runtime governance outputs (classification, gates, decisions, repairs, and audit records) fit your internal review and agent oversight workflows.
Core constraints
Artifact-based or shadow-mode evaluation — no unauthorized production enforcement in initial pilots.
No real-world execution against production systems without explicit controlled-enforcement agreement.
No deployment authorization — pilot outputs inform fit assessment, not go-live approval.
What we need for pilot design
Description of AI workflows under evaluation
Tool/API actions the agent can perform
Known failure modes or risk scenarios
Current review or escalation process
Desired success metrics
Permission to run shadow-mode evaluation on representative workflows
Partner supplies / LUXION delivers
Partner supplies
Representative agent traces, tool-call logs, or draft action proposals (sanitized).
Defined success criteria aligned to your oversight workflow.
Technical point of contact for weekly review sessions.
LUXION delivers
Structured governance outputs on submitted artifacts or shadow-mode streams.
Classification, gate decisions, repair recommendations, and audit ledger entries.
Weekly review summary and fit assessment report.
Success metrics
Event rate of latent risk surfaces before headline failures.
Reviewer time-on-loop for governed vs baseline traces.
Audit record completeness and replay fidelity.
Qualitative fit for internal escalation workflows.
Boundaries
No ROI figures unless measured in your environment.
No safety certification or regulatory validation claims.
No production throughput or fleet efficiency claims from pilot artifacts.
Confidentiality and data handling per mutual agreement.
Deployment model
Guardian Runtime is currently available for technical reviews, shadow-mode pilots, controlled enforcement pilots, and enterprise infrastructure validation.
Initial engagements are low-risk, measurable, and evidence-producing.
Technical Review
Operating mode
For teams evaluating agentic AI workflows and governance requirements.
Outputs
workflow risk map
action-surface analysis
governance gaps
recommended pilot scope
Shadow-Mode Pilot
Operating mode
Observe proposed actions without blocking production execution.
Outputs
logs
traces
routing analysis
risk report
Controlled Enforcement Pilot
Operating mode
Govern bounded workflows and measure enforcement quality.
Outputs
false positives
false negatives
workflow completion
escalation quality
audit evidence
Enterprise Deployment
Operating mode
Integrate runtime assurance and compute governance across selected production workflows.
Outputs
runtime assurance integration
compute-governance reporting
operational monitoring
ongoing improvement loop
Pilot pathway detail
Technical Review → Shadow-Mode Pilot → Controlled Enforcement → Enterprise Deployment — outputs and operating modes per stage.
Technical Review
Operating mode
For teams evaluating agentic AI workflows and governance requirements.
Outputs
workflow risk map
action-surface analysis
governance gaps
recommended pilot scope
Shadow-Mode Pilot
Operating mode
Observe proposed actions without blocking production execution.
Outputs
logs
traces
routing analysis
risk report
Controlled Enforcement Pilot
Operating mode
Govern bounded workflows and measure enforcement quality.
Outputs
false positives
false negatives
workflow completion
escalation quality
audit evidence
Enterprise Deployment
Operating mode
Integrate runtime assurance and compute governance across selected production workflows.
Outputs
runtime assurance integration
compute-governance reporting
operational monitoring
ongoing improvement loop
Commercial terms are defined privately based on workflow scope, number of governed actions, integration depth, evidence requirements, and deployment mode. Guardian Runtime does not publish fixed pricing at this stage.
Inquiry draft
Inquiry
Submit your inquiry below. I'll review it and respond if there is a fit.